• Main Site
  • Property Tips Blog
  • Current Listings

Archive for the ‘legal’ Category

What Happens When You Convert Motel Units Into Dwellings

Tuesday, December 8th, 2009

Interpretative Decision (ID) 2008/136 by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) points out that if a unit was previously a motel room then its first sale as an independent dwelling will subject to GST.

This ID considers a motel that was constructed before GST was introduced, where the units were owned by the entity that constructed them and had been operated as a motel.

The units were strata titled and sold individually without any substantial renovations.

Commercial residential premises and the first sale of new residential premises are subject to GST on sale if the owner is registered for GST.

The ruling states that an individual unit did not qualify as commercial residential premises but the change of use made each unit a new residential premises.

The concession that if new residential premises are used as a rental for a continuous period of at least five years then their sale would not be subject to GST could not apply because they had been used in a motel business.

Properties used for residential accommodation before December 2, 1998 are not subject to GST when later sold. Residential accommodation is not defined in the relevant legislation but in this ID the ATO concluded that a motel business was not within this reference to residential accommodation. As a result the taxpayer had to remit GST on the sale of an old unit that had not been substantially renovated.

Tags: tax
Posted in Taxation, legal | No Comments »

Part 4 Legal Loopholes

Friday, December 4th, 2009

5. Undisclosed Leases And Options

The standard contracts of sale used for the sale of real estate contain provisions that the property is sold with vacant possession unless details of tenancies and options to extend the tenancies are set out.

Many properties which are tenanted, however, are sold with vacant possession and without the details of the tenancies being noted on the contract of sale, on the assumption that the letting agent will terminate that lease before settlement so that vacant possession can be passed to the buyer.

Where, however, the letting agent is different to the selling agent, there may not be a lot of cooperation between the two agencies. If you were the buyer of such a property then it would pay you to make discreet enquiries to ascertain whether the tenant would be vacating on the completion date.

If they fail to do so then there is fundamental breach by the seller under such a contract, as they would fail to deliver vacant possession and this entitles you to terminate the contract of sale as the buyer. If you sign a contract to purchase a property which is tenanted, call for a copy of the lease and carefully check that the terms of the lease are disclosed in the contract of sale.

If the lease is incorrectly described in the contract of sale as a periodic (i.e. month to month tenancy) and the lease document shows that the lease is for a fixed term and has, say, another six months to run, unless the tenant vacates the property on settlement, in most cases you would have the right to terminate the contract of sale and receive a refund of the deposit. Likewise, check the contract of sale against a copy of the lease to ensure it discloses any options to extend the term of the lease that are contained in the lease document.

Options are for the benefit of the tenants and it is generally the tenants’ call about whether they exercise the option and stay on. If details of the option are not included in the contract of sale then this may also give you the right to terminate the contract of sale or at least use it as a lever to renegotiate the price down.

Ask your solicitor, too, to also carry out a title search of the property and check that the parties shown as the landlord or lessor on the lease are the same as the parties that actually own the property.

Posted in legal | No Comments »

Part 3 Legal Loopholes

Friday, December 4th, 2009

4. Easements

When you buy a property most standard contracts provide that you acquire the property free of encumbrances unless details of these encumbrances are noted on the contract of sale.

The main type of encumbrance that can affect the property is an easement. An easement is the right to use a property in a particular way without taking anything from it, for example the right to passover the property where you have purchased a battle-axed property (i.e. the property has no road frontage itself and access to the property is via a right of way along a road in front of the property that you are purchasing). Other examples of easements are rights of way granted to the electricity authorities, Telstra or the local council for drainage purposes.

If you are looking for a loophole in the contract of sale you should immediately carry out a title search to determine whether the property is affected by any easements. Easements are what lawyers call “a classic defect in title” to a property. Even a humble drainage easement that may be situated along the boundary of the property may constitute an easement that gives you rights to terminate the contract.

Where an easement materially affects the use of a property a buyer has the right to terminate the contract of sale unless details of the easement are noted on the contract of sale.

The big thing to remember about easements and why they are so important is that it is unlawful to build over an easement.

A group of client companies purchased a large parcel of vacant land to construct a storage shed development. Diagonally through the land ran a drainage easement for the benefit of a neighboring property. It was the classic humble drainage easement. When they searched the title to the property and checked the terms of the easement that was registered on the title, the results revealed that the path of the easement was diagonally through the middle of the block and was much wider than originally represented by the selling agent. The development could still have easily proceeded and been built around the path of the easements, however the configuration of the development that would have been built around the path of the easement would have drastically reduced the income yield from the storage sheds (less sheds could be constructed on the site if the path of the easement remained as is).

If you were the buyer of this property you may have the right to terminate the contract  because the existence of this easement was not noted on the contract of sale itself.

Once an easement is noted on the contract of sale, this has the legal effect of making the buyer’s purchase of the easement. If you had been this buyer then the search of the easement would have sent you scampering off to your lawer’s office to check the terms of the easement and your ability to pull out of the contract of sale.

In that real-life situation, however, the buyers successfully negotiated a re-routing of the path of the easement with the neighbor who had the benefit of the easement so everyone lived happily ever after.

Posted in legal | No Comments »

Part 2 Legal Loopholes

Friday, December 4th, 2009

2. All Parties To Sign

With multiple buyers or sellers it is vital to realise that if all parties have not individually signed the contract of sale, then there is no contract. For example, in the case of four sellers, namely two couples, each of the two couples (i.e. four people) must specifically sign the contract.

As an investor you should also scan all of the signatures and initials on the contract and if, say, there are four sellers who are selling the property, check there are four full signatures and four sets of initials alongside all of the alterations to the contract. Contracts usually also provide for there to be a witness to all signatures. This however, is not essential and failure to have a signature witnessed will not be fatal to the legality of the contract. The purpose of having a witness is just to have back-up evidence or corroboration so that if one of the parties whose signature appears in the contract denies they actually signed it and claims their signature was forged, the person who witnessed their signature could come forward to confirm they actually saw them sign it on the day.

Can a husband sign for his wife and vice versa? There is no law that says a spouse has authority to sign a contract of sale for their partner without there being in existence a registered Power of Attorney or specific written authority where, for example, mum authorises dad to sign the contract on her behalf. An exception to this rule is where the parties have bought the property in partnership (a “partnership” is a legal term and simply buying a property jointly with someone else does not by itself constitute that purchase as a partnership).

3. Area Of The Land

Most contracts of sale contain a provision for the area of the property to be inserted.

Great care must be taken in completing this provision of the contract and in most cases, unless you are perfectly certain what the area is, it is best to leave it blank.

What licence does the law allow to forgive an error in the completion of the area? If, for example, the true area is 1000 square metres, however the contract was incorrectly completed as 1100 square metres, does this entitle the buyer to terminate the contract of sale or bring an action against the seller for compensation (or threaten to bring such an action in an attempt to lever down the price)? In Queensland, for example, the contract provides that where any area is completed in the contract of sale, the seller guarantees this is the area (more or less).

The case law allows a discrepancy of between two to five per cent and forgives an error of this magnitude, but not more.

The reality is that in practice the error is usually much greater than two to five per cent, so it is worth checking any area shown in the contract with information on the title deed for the property contained at the Titles Office. A discrepancy of even well under two per cent of the area of a property can be fatal in some cases.

Posted in legal | No Comments »

Legal Loopholes Part 1

Friday, December 4th, 2009

If you have ever signed a contract of sale and not long afterwards had buyer’s remorse, then read on to find out what technical defects there may be in the contract that may allow you to walk away from the transaction.

The Starting Point

Firstly, do not share your regrets with the real estate agent. If you do, then understand that they are the seller’s agent and it is very likely you will be advised that you have a “watertight contract” and there is no way you can walk away from the transaction.

Don’t be deterred either, by comments from the agent such as “I’ve been in this game 20 years now so take it from me, you’ve got a watertight contract.”

The reality is they probably haven’t got 20 years experience and their advice to you is based on just one year’s experience 20 times over. It might be worth getting legal advice.

What are the loopholes then?

  1. Is There A Contract?

For there to be a binding and enforceable contract there are a number of essential elements that must be satisfied under contract law.

Firstly, there must be an offer. Secondly, there must be an acceptance of that offer (or in the case of a counter offer, acceptance of the counter offer). Finally, and most importantly, there must be communication of acceptance by the person who accepts the offer (or the counter offer) to the other party. Without this fact being communicated to the other party or their solicitor then there isn’t a legal contract in existence.

If, for example, the contract of sale was signed by you as a buyer during the day and the agent collected it and visited the seller later that evening to attempt to persuade them to accept your offer, until you receive a copy of a contract signed by the seller or alternatively advice from his agent that they have accepted your offer and signed the contract, there is no contract.

If you do not hear from the agent during the course of the evening and you have cold feet the next morning you need to immediately instruct your solicitor to fax the agent with your instructions that as no acceptance of your offer has been communicated to you, your offer is withdrawn. In that situation there is no contract of sale.

This example also illustrates why a legally educated real estate agent will always ring you as a buyer no matter how late at night it might be to “congratulate” you on your successful purchase. You know now it is more that just good PR to do so. It is essential to lock you into the contract.

Posted in legal | No Comments »

  • Categories

    • building (5)
    • Buying Tips (7)
    • Economy (1)
    • Finance (2)
    • For Investors (11)
    • Interest Rates (7)
    • legal (5)
    • Motivation (2)
    • renovation (4)
    • Selling Tips (15)
    • Taxation (4)
    • Uncategorized (3)
  • August 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Jan    
     1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    3031  
  • Archives

    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • July 2009
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Valid XHTML
    • XFN
    • WordPress

Copyright © 2010 - Happening Real Estate Property Tips | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS)

WordPress theme designed by web design